<img alt="" src="https://secure.perk0mean.com/171547.png" style="display:none;">

The History and Development of Pinnacle 21

Clinical Programming Team

Until 2007, the Food Drug & Administration (FDA) and the biopharmaceutical industry were grappled by the non-standardized sources of data. Gathering all the heterogenous data and mapping to the internal standards of the pharma companies proved to be the greatest challenge of the time. By the end of 2007, and towards the beginning of 2008, the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) gained ground in its mission to develop a global set of standards. Eventually, CDISC began shaping the entire industry as FDA started requesting submission data in standardized formats, though CDISC compliant software options were limited.1,2 The ‘study data standards’ provide a consistent general framework for organizing data, including templates for datasets, standard names for variables, identify appropriate controlled terminology and standard ways of doing calculations with common variables.3

Read More
Topics: Clinical Trials, CDISC Guidelines, CDISC, FDA, Standardization, Clinical Programming, SDTM, CDISC Standards, ADaM Datasets, CDISC CDASH, Clinical Research Organization, Open Source, Open Standards, CRO, Define.xml, Pinnacle 21

4 ways to Improve Clinical Data Quality in the Digital Era

Clinical Data Management Team

The shift from paper to Electronic Data Capture (EDC) in the clinical trial world saw a shift in the way we look at the quality measurements of clinical data management (CDM) activities. The paper world had a clear understanding that the quality of the clinical data collected was simply the quality of the transcription work teams performed of transferring data from paper to a database. The Quality Control (QC) of paper versus database had a set standard for sampling of √N+1 or 20 subjects, whichever was smaller and a 100% QC of critical variables. Acceptable error rates were 0.5% which was widely agreed across the industry. These thresholds were no longer necessary when EDC enabled sites to enter the data directly and transcription was no longer needed. However, it is the role of the data management teams to be involved in many efforts to prepare data for appropriate analysis and submissions.

Read More
Topics: CDISC, Case Report Form (CRF), Electronic Data Capture, SDTM, CDISC CDASH, Quality Process Improvement, Mobile Device, Wearables in Clinical Trials, Wearables, Clinical Data Management, Electronica Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO)

Real World Evidence in Drug Development [Podcast]

Statistical Consultancy Team

Welcome to our FiresideSTATS Podcast Episode 2. Today we are joined by our Statistical experts, Niccolo and Emily.

Read More
Topics: Clinical Trials, Historical Data, Drug Development, Oncology, Statistics, Real World Data, Statistical Consultancy

Real-Time Oncology Review (RTOR): First Drug Approval

Statistical Consultancy Team


In 1992, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) introduced four distinct and successful approaches known as Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy, Accelerated Approval, and Fast Track approval of the investigational drug. Under the ‘accelerated approval’ regulation, surrogate endpoints for serious conditions that filled an unmet medical need are reviewed by FDA, allowing faster approval of drugs. A two-tiered system of review times – Standard Review and Priority Review were introduced by FDA under the Prescription Drug User Act (PDUFA). FDA reviews ‘Priority Review’ designated drugs within 6 months (compared to 10 months under standard review).[i]

Read More
Topics: Clinical Trials, FDA, Clinical Study Design, Oncology, Statistical Consultancy, Real-Time Oncology Review (RTOR)

Respiratory Clinical Trials to Support COVID-19 Survivors

Statistical Consultancy Team


The leading cause of death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the virus ‘severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2’ (SARS‑CoV‑2), is respiratory failure from acute respiratory distress syndrome.[1] Patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation had an 88% mortality rate in one study in New York, and a 53% mortality rate in one study in the UK.[2][3] While an alarming proportion of patients with respiratory failure are dying, for the those who recover there is an urgent need to consider, and subsequently manage,  their longer-term care.[4] Patients who have survived the COVID‑19 infection continue to experience feelings of fatigue, shortness of breath and reduced exercise tolerance. There is currently limited information regarding the best route to full recovery for post-coronavirus infection patients. Care will likely be multidisciplinary in nature and include a respiratory review along with physiotherapy, nutritional advice, psychiatric support, and potentially other disciplinary involvement.

Read More
Topics: Clinical Trials, Clinical Study Design, Clinical Trial Phases, Clinical Data Management, Statistical Analysis Plan, Statistical Consultancy, Covid-19, Pulmonary, Respiratory

Regulatory Writing – An Integral Part of Clinical Research

Medical Writing Team

There are two main areas in medical writing, medical communications and regulatory writing. This blog focuses on regulatory writing, which involves the preparation of clinical study and regulatory submission documentation.

Read More
Topics: FDA, European Medicines Agency, Medical Writing, Regulatory Writing, Clinical Trial Documentation, Clinical Documents, Clinical Study Report

Remote Monitoring During Clinical Trials - COVID-19 Update

Commercial Team

This article has been updated in May 2020 to reflect the recent guidance by European Medicines Agency and other regulatory bodies on remote monitoring due to the recent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.

Within the last few decades the number and complexity of clinical trials has increased considerably, not only across the industry but also within individual companies.  With this increase comes the enhanced pressure of effectively monitoring these trials.

Read More
Topics: Regulatory Requirements, Clinical Trials, Good Clinical Practice (GCP), Clinical Data Storage, FDA, Case Report Form (CRF), Remote Monitoring, Adverse Events (AEs), European Medicines Agency, Ethics, On-Site Monitoring, CRAs, Risk Based Monitoring, Centralized Monitoring, Data Quality Oversight, rSDV, Centralized Statistical Monitoring

A Guide to CDISC SDTM Standards, Theory and Application

Clinical Programming Team

The Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) creates standards that is now mandatory for the regulatory submission to the FDA and PMDA. Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) is one of the standards which provides a standard for streamlined data in collection, management, analysis and reporting. If your data is not in SDTM standards then a pharmaceutical company or Clinical Research Organizations (CRO) will regard SDTM mapping to the latest version of SDTM standards for regulatory submission.

Read More
Topics: Statistical Programming, CDISC Guidelines, CDISC SDTM, SDTM Domains, CDISC, Standardization, Clinical Programming, SAS Programming, CDISC Interchange

A Guide to Adaptive Randomization based on a Patient's Characteristics

Holly Jackson


Clinical Trial Design

The most common design used for Phase II and Phase III clinical trials is the randomized controlled trial design. In randomized controlled trials, the probability of being assigned the study treatment or the control treatment is fixed throughout the trial and is normally 50%, so that each treatment is given to the same number of patients. This approach leads to a high‑chance of identifying if one treatment is significantly better than the other. The fact that 50% of the trial population is assigned to the control treatment is not a particular issue in common diseases such as cardiovascular disease. For example, of the 7 million people in the United Kingdom (UK) with cardiovascular disease, if 200 of them are involved a clinical trial, then 99.9% of the overall cardiovascular disease population will benefit from the results of the clinical trial[1].

Read More
Topics: Clinical Study Design, Adaptive Trial Design, Statistical Consultancy, Randomized Controlled Trials, Personalized Medicine, Patient Characteristics

Get ready for Plain Language Summaries in Medical Writing

Medical Writing Team

The imminent application of Clinical Trial Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014, estimated to happen in 2020, will peak an emergent era of transparency in clinical development. The regulation applies to all interventional clinical trials (Phase 1 to 4) performed in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA), plus additionally specified paediatric trials, and covers documents at the single clinical trial level irrespective of the drug’s marketing approval status. The regulation requires the disclosure of the study Protocol, Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier (IMPD; Sections S and E), Investigator’s Brochure (IB), Subject Information Sheet, Clinical Study Report (CSR; redacted) and a Plain Language Summary (PLS; also known as a Laypersons Summary) for each clinical trial within 12 months of the end of the trial (6 months for paediatric trials). Disclosure is readily welcomed by study participants who want to know what has been learned from their participation and is in accordance with the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) goal of protecting and fostering public health by allowing better‑informed use of medicines. We will be able to learn from past successes as well as failures now that any biased under‑reporting of results will be stopped.

Read More
Topics: Regulatory Requirements, Medical Writing, Regulatory Writing, Clinical Trial Documentation, Clinical Study Report, Plain Language Summaries

Welcome to The Quanticate Blog

We aim to provide information and support written by our experienced staff. We want to share our knowledge and create an archive of information that you will be able to engage with, share and comment on.

Subscribe to Email Updates

New call-to-action

Most Read

Posts by Topic

Expand all